From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 9 21:48:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D8D16A4CE for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:48:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pinus.cc.fer.hr (pinus.cc.fer.hr [161.53.73.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9265B43D53 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:48:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr) Received: from [161.53.72.113] (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113]) by pinus.cc.fer.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id j19LmYJu002455 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:48:34 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <420A852E.5000708@fer.hr> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:48:30 +0100 From: Ivan Voras User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041213) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: current@freebsd.org References: <20050209205943.34c39e15.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <420A838B.9050600@portaone.com> In-Reply-To: <420A838B.9050600@portaone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: MySQL benchmarks X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:48:36 -0000 Maxim Sobolev wrote: > The difference between linux and everything else in those tests is so > significant even on UP, so that I suspect that something wrong with the > approach. The only way to prove it is to make a better-controlled benchmark. But I wouldn't bet on it - from things seen on this and performance@ lists, the numbers, somewhat sadly, seem about right. Of course, I might just be overly pessimistic :)