From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 14 16:17:31 2000 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 14 16:17:26 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n37.san.rr.com (dt051n37.san.rr.com [204.210.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B1A37B402; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 16:17:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from slave (Studded@slave [10.0.0.1]) by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA92986; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 16:17:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 16:17:06 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton X-Sender: doug@dt051n37.san.rr.com To: Akinori MUSHA Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, asami@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New variable proposal: USE_NEWPATCH In-Reply-To: <863dfvxhvt.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > So now, hereby I'd propose we introduce a new variable USE_NEWPATCH as > attached. That would help us in a few cases it won't pay us to bother > with. How about we import the new patch instead? -- "The most difficult thing in the world is to know how to do a thing and to watch someone else do it wrong without comment." -- Theodore H. White Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message