From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 05:56:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA4316A480 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC80813C447 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m0N5u1ID042992; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:56:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Paul Schmehl" , Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:57:22 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <7FBCA209CD1A8EEDB978FFBB@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:56:02 -0800 (PST) Cc: Subject: RE: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:56:03 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Paul Schmehl > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:25 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? > > > --On Tuesday, January 22, 2008 13:03:27 +0100 Wojciech Puchar > wrote: > > > http://www.spamsuite.com/node/351 > > > > jest first step to criminalize unix at all > > _______________________________________________ > > We aren't criminals, but *he* is. > Paul, you do realize that Sierra is a known newsgroup spammer and that the lawsuit in question was just filed against a spamfighter by a spammer? Also, that the "judgement" that is in the post is actually a prepared order, written by Plaintiff's counsel, it wasn't written by the judge. This case is sitting in the appellate courts somewhere, gathering dust. Nobody has paid anything to anybody, except to the lawyers. Sierra makes their money selling to morons what Google gives out for free. Please, unless your willing to do the research, don't waste time commenting. Ted