Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:01:31 +0900 From: UEBAYASHI Masao <masao@nf.enveng.titech.ac.jp> To: sue@welearn.com.au Cc: jesus.monroy@usa.net, kheuer@gwdu60.gwdg.de, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [FreeBSD Man Pages] Message-ID: <19990630190131N.masao@nf.enveng.titech.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <19990630194026.02734@welearn.com.au> References: <19990630092816.5964.qmail@nwcst021.netaddress.usa.net> <19990630194026.02734@welearn.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Very incorrect. Just a few days ago I show that 15%
> > of the online whatis(1) and man(1) records where
> > incorrect.
> For one definition of "incorrect". What you showed does not detract
> from the point that Konrad is making.
For my studying English, I think the _trick_ is that the first word
``incorrect'' can be read as two cases.
If it was really trick, there is more stricter term of logic of
science for it, but I cannot remember it now...
Masao
---
At last my signature can be internationalized! LOL
|-
_|_
-|- -|-
/|\ /|\
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990630190131N.masao>