From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jan  9 04:58:25 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA07635
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 9 Jan 1996 04:58:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Relay1.Austria.EU.net (relay1.Austria.EU.net [192.92.138.47])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA07619
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 9 Jan 1996 04:58:14 -0800 (PST)
From: marino.ladavac@aut.alcatel.at
Received: from atusks01.aut.alcatel.at by Relay1.Austria.EU.net with SMTP id AA04242
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for <current@freebsd.org>); Tue, 9 Jan 1996 13:57:38 +0100
Received: from atuhc16 by atusks01.aut.alcatel.at (4.1/SMI-4.1/AAA-1.29/main)
	id AA22121; Tue, 9 Jan 96 13:56:43 +0100
Message-Id: <9601091256.AA22121@atuhc16.atusks01.aut.alcatel.at>
Received: by atuhc16
	(1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA04638; Tue, 9 Jan 1996 13:56:42 +0100
Subject: Re: Prognosis of 2.2-960107-SNAP
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) (Satoshi Asami)
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 96 13:56:41 MET
Cc: current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199601090753.XAA15054@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>; from "Satoshi Asami" at Jan 8, 96 11:53 pm
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


>  * I loved putting this to a test once (I happened to know the majority of
>  * the people in the room) when someone didn't understand the difference
>  * between ontology and epistimology and stated as a "fact" that there
>  * would be two people with the same birthday.  There weren't.  It wasn't
>  * an impossibility for this to be the case, merely an improbability.

> That person's gotta be one of the dumbest guys around, how can the
> "guarantee" threshold not be at 366?  Or am I totally misunderstanding
> the question? ;)

Becasue it's 367 :)

/Alby

> Satoshi