From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 17 07:57:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E365C6C; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:57:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5AAA8FC0A; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id JAA23533; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:57:38 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1TkVZy-0004iV-DQ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:57:38 +0200 Message-ID: <50CED06F.6080909@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:57:35 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng References: <50CCAB99.4040308@FreeBSD.org> <50CE5B54.3050905@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Davide Italiano , Alexander Motin , FreeBSD Current , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:57:49 -0000 on 17/12/2012 03:29 Adrian Chadd said the following: > On 16 December 2012 15:37, Alexander Motin wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Here is one more version. Unless something new will be found/reported this >> may be the last one, because me and Davide are quite satisfied with the >> results. If everything will be fine, I think we could commit it to HEAD >> closer to the end of the week: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/calloutng_12_16.patch > > Hi, > > Don't you think one week is a little on the low side for reviewing > something this critical? Thank god that this feature was developed in a branch, it was developed for a long period of time and there were people who routinely reviewed and tested (and really used) it. And yeah, its design was announced and discussed well in advance too. > Would you mind approaching some of the cluster peeps and seeing if > they'll run this up on the ref10* boxes and VMs, just to get some > further exposure? -- Andriy Gapon