From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 20:51:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7973106564A for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:51:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36CF8FC17 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id XAA16314; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:50:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1SN9Ap-00009t-SR; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:50:51 +0300 Message-ID: <4F986372.1070400@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:49:54 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120420 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Lidl References: <20120424171909.GA99220@pix.net> In-Reply-To: <20120424171909.GA99220@pix.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: criteria for patch inclusion in patch release? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:51:11 -0000 on 24/04/2012 20:19 Kurt Lidl said the following: > What determines the patch worthiness of particular fixes that > have gone into a the source tree for inclusion into the next > patch release of a given -RELEASE branch? > > As an example, there are two patches that improve life for > those of us who use fxp ethernet adaptors (r233158, r233585). > Both of these came out after the branch of 8.3-RELEASE, > I believe. Neither of these patches are in 8.3-STABLE, as > far as I can tell. I think they ought to be in at least > 8-STABLE or 9-STABLE, based on their change dates and the > "MFC after: 1 week"/"MFC after: 2 weeks" notations in the > SVN entries. > > In my ideal world, these two patches would wind up in the > first patch release of 8.3-RELEASE, but that's my ideal world. > Is there some way to nominate these changes for inclusion > in what will be the p1 release of 8.3? > > Thanks for any insight... Only security issues and severe bugs affecting majority of the users get into patch releases. "Normal" bug fixes (should) get into the next release. -- Andriy Gapon