From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 10 15:18:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7205B16A41F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:18:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mipam@ibb.net) Received: from ux11.ltcm.net (213-84-197-131.adsl.xs4all.nl [213.84.197.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5C043D46 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:18:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mipam@ibb.net) Received: from ux11.ltcm.net (mipam@localhost.ltcm.net [IPv6:::1]) by ux11.ltcm.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/UX11TT) with ESMTP id j7AFHwqC024157 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:17:59 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (mipam@localhost) by ux11.ltcm.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id j7AFHu0T025228 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:17:57 +0200 (MEST) X-Authentication-Warning: ux11.ltcm.net: mipam owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:17:56 +0200 (MEST) From: Mipam X-X-Sender: mipam@ux11.ltcm.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: named -n paramter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:18:02 -0000 Hi, With threads disabled in bind9, is it still usefull to give -n 2 for example if you got a system with 2 cpu's? The man page only mentioned worker threads... Bye, Mipam