From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 6 13:19:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6800216A420; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 13:19:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nik@ngo.org.uk) Received: from jc.ngo.org.uk (jc.ngo.org.uk [69.55.225.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA1F43D62; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 13:19:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nik@ngo.org.uk) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (i-83-67-27-141.freedom2surf.net [83.67.27.141]) by jc.ngo.org.uk (8.13.4/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k26DJAbQ032408; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 05:19:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nik@ngo.org.uk) Message-ID: <440C36CD.1070406@ngo.org.uk> Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:19:09 +0000 From: Nik Clayton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060117) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= References: <20060304141957.14716.qmail@web32705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060304152433.W61086@fledge.watson.org> <200603051930.25957.peter@wemm.org> <863bhwvtrh.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060306101831.GA21025@tara.freenix.org> <864q2b2758.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <864q2b2758.fsf@xps.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: (0) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 69.55.225.33 Cc: tobez@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:19:19 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Ollivier Robert writes: >> According to Dag-Erling Smrgrav: >>> svk is not an alternative to svn, it's an svn client. >> As far as I understand svk, it is more than "just a svn client". It uses >> some of the svn layers (file system, remote access for example) but add >> layers of its own for the distributed/decentralised concept. > > The "master repo" still has to run plain svn, because svk does not > support remote access; this also means that you can't mirror a mirror. Yes you can. You just need to run a (read-only) svnserve for your $HOME/.svk/local repo (and any other repos you might have set up in depotmap). I do this all the time. N