From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 8 19:38:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0C816A4CE for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 19:38:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [212.12.46.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D116743D2F for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 19:38:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from mailnull by anduin.net with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34; FreeBSD) id 1BXmQB-000NEy-5i for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:38:12 +0200 Received: from [217.8.136.185] (helo=[192.168.1.10]) by anduin.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34; FreeBSD) id 1BXmQ1-000NEY-12; Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:37:57 +0200 Message-ID: <40C6158B.9020006@anduin.net> Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:37:47 +0200 From: Eirik Oeverby User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040504) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Lang References: <20040608152914.GA78505@x-anthony.com> <20040608155925.GB2091@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <20040608164726.GA80174@x-anthony.com> <20040608170130.GC2091@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <20040608191357.GA23201@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> In-Reply-To: <20040608191357.GA23201@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on anduin.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.5 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: opteron build failure/500MB termcap.db X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:38:13 -0000 Hoi, takes guts to say sorry in public. Kudos for that. Come back when you're having a better day ;) /Eirik Daniel Lang wrote: > Hi again, > > Daniel Lang wrote on Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 07:01:30PM +0200: > >>in this respect and I apologize for my rude answer. >> >>However, you could have made the point more clear, >>and illustrating your statement in the subject e.g. by >>showing something like: > > [..] > > It seems I'm having a really bad day. Please forget what I said, > I'll shut up for now. > > Sorry, > Daniel