From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Nov 21 19:16:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EAB37B401 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:16:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net (conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB65443E91 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:16:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rneswold@earthlink.net) Received: from h-69-3-11-24.chcgilgm.covad.net ([69.3.11.24] helo=harpo.neswold.local) by conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18F4Id-0004Ou-00; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:16:12 -0800 Received: by harpo.neswold.local (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 445811A9D8; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:16:17 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:16:17 -0600 From: Rich Neswold To: Matthew Emmerton Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ppp works, but natd not working Message-ID: <20021122031617.GA94687@harpo.neswold.local> Reply-To: Rich Neswold References: <200211210454.gAL4sFIV063929@arch20m.dellroad.org> <01cb01c2911b$83e59180$3164a8c0@number6.loop.bpa.nu> <00c801c291b5$747862f0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00c801c291b5$747862f0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> X-GnuPG-Fingerprint: 289D B71D 1FE0 6D71 8ACC 3494 6661 3E8B D14A C5DC X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wasn't it 21-Nov-2002, at 06:26PM, when Matthew Emmerton said: > Since ppp has built in NAT support (enabled with the -nat flag), is there > any special reason you using natd? This is a very good question. If you're using ppp, you really should use the built-in NAT support. If you're only using ipfw to restrict incoming ppp traffic, I'd also recommend using the filtering provided by ppp. The IP filtering and NAT support in ppp work great. --=20 Rich Neswold =20 efax: 1.240.536.7092 web: home.earthlink.net/~rneswold icq: 174908475 --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE93aGAZmE+i9FKxdwRAhspAKDySO7kxLBbTLdgLkXjnwT3S2FYfQCfWfsw IAQlnlk1vYnz+oOJ/2umwMU= =WUx2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message