From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Aug 16 18:53:28 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8795237B401; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 18:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blues.jpj.net (blues.jpj.net [208.210.80.156])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7FB3E43F3F; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 18:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from trevor@jpj.net)
Received: from blues.jpj.net (localhost.jpj.net [127.0.0.1])
	by blues.jpj.net (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h7H1rQxN083653;
	Sat, 16 Aug 2003 21:53:26 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from trevor@jpj.net)
Received: from localhost (trevor@localhost)h7H1rQoI083650;
	Sat, 16 Aug 2003 21:53:26 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: blues.jpj.net: trevor owned process doing -bs
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 21:53:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net>
To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030815203006.GA95872@dragon.nuxi.com>
Message-ID: <20030815174223.E39433@blues.jpj.net>
References: <200307210044.h6L0iSxU074764@repoman.freebsd.org>
 <20030815203006.GA95872@dragon.nuxi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux_base-8 Makefile distinfo.i386
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:53:29 -0000

> Should we start using linux_base-8 as the default "linux base" yet?

reasons not to:

- it's only for i386
- I haven't asked users for feedback about it, and haven't tested it all
  that much
- it's marked RESTRICTED

my plans:

- update linux_base-7 to 7.2
- avoid legal problems from GNU GPL by making separate ports for
  the corresponding sources
-- 
Trevor Johnson