From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 6 22:08:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080471065672; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 22:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhurlin@gwdg.de) Received: from fmailer.gwdg.de (fmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFEE8FC14; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 22:08:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from p57918c7a.dip.t-dialin.net ([87.145.140.122] helo=krabat.raven.hur) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RjHxA-0003iY-AK; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:08:00 +0100 Message-ID: <4F0770BF.9080906@gwdg.de> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:07:59 +0100 From: Rainer Hurling User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd References: <4F072C13.6000606@gwdg.de> <4F073B1B.6000707@gwdg.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated: Id:rhurlin X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by exiscan+sophie Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel does not build on 10.0-CURRENT (amd64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:08:02 -0000 On 06.01.2012 22:42 (UTC+1), Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 6 January 2012 10:19, Rainer Hurling wrote: > >> I commented all wireless network drivers and their options out. But the >> error remains. Is it necessary to have this option uncommented even when the >> driver ath is commented out? > > Yes, because of how the wlan/ath modules are built. You need to have > AH_SUPPORT_AR5416 in the kernel config file, as the driver/module > currently doesn't build without it. I just tested it with AH_SUPPORT_AR5416 enabled (but ath devices disabled) and it builds fine. > I'll eventually fix that, but right now I just want to leave that > option in and not hack up the Makefile to define said option. > Otherwise other options (eg enabling 11n, enabling hal debugging, etc) > are completely ignored when building modules. > > Same with IEEE80211_SUPPORT_MESH i believe. I should really re-verify that. Even with IEEE80211_SUPPORT_MESH disabled the kernel builds. So it seems this is not necessary to activate. Thanks again for help and clarifying it, Rainer > Adrian