From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Apr 25 07:11:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA17394 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 07:11:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.EUnet.hu (www.eunet.hu [193.225.28.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA17345 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 07:10:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.EUnet.hu, id QAA08010; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 16:10:41 +0200 Received: (from zgabor@localhost) by CoDe.hu (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA00328; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 14:42:04 +0200 (MET DST) From: Zahemszky Gabor Message-Id: <199704251242.OAA00328@CoDe.hu> Subject: Re: HylaFAX broken on 2.2.0-R? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org (FreeBSD questions) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 14:42:04 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: scotto@remuda.com In-Reply-To: from Scott Overholser at "Apr 15, 97 07:44:29 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL11 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > thanks for the info! here are my results on a 2.2.0-R system: > > $ f ; echo $? > 78 > $ g ; echo $? > 0 <-- this one is not correct as you describe > $ h ; echo $? > 78 > $ exit > > if this truely be a bug, what should happen next? as i mention below, > i've worked around the problem. i suppose someone should take steps to > make it right. i'll gladly file a bug if someone will clue me in on the > correct procedure. Another sorry for the slow response. As you wrote, it's a bug in 2.2.0's /bin/sh, so send-pr it. send-pr, fill in the blanks, and send only the test script with the three functions and the result, as you sent it to me. Bye, Gabor