From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 15 17:10:33 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEBC6695;
 Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:10:33 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kikuchan@uranus.dti.ne.jp)
Received: from vsmtp07.dti.ne.jp (vsmtp07.dti.ne.jp [202.216.231.142])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0097CF;
 Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:10:32 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kikuchan@uranus.dti.ne.jp)
Received: from mail.dream.jp (webmail01.ga.dti.ne.jp [202.216.229.152]) by
 vsmtp07.dti.ne.jp (3.11v) with ESMTP AUTH id t5FHAQ4b002127;
 Tue, 16 Jun 2015 02:10:26 +0900 (JST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=iso-2022-jp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 02:10:26 +0900
From: <kikuchan@uranus.dti.ne.jp>
To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
Cc: <freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: How to implement jail-aware SysV IPC (with my nasty patch)
In-Reply-To: <2B7AA933-CB74-4737-8330-6E623A31C6DA@lists.zabbadoz.net>
References: <cc18282ebe394476120a139239225782@imap.cm.dream.jp>
 <2B7AA933-CB74-4737-8330-6E623A31C6DA@lists.zabbadoz.net>
Message-ID: <beed5db2dd2638359e2d71387a3e2885@imap.cm.dream.jp>
X-Sender: kikuchan@uranus.dti.ne.jp
User-Agent: DTI MyMail/0.3-trunk
X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" <freebsd-jail.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-jail@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail>,
 <mailto:freebsd-jail-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:10:33 -0000

On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:53:53 +0000, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> removed hackers, added virtualization.
> 
> 
>> On 12 Jun 2015, at 01:17 , kikuchan@uranus.dti.ne.jp wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I’m (still) trying to figure out how jail-aware SysV IPC mechanism should be.
> 
> The best way probably is to finally get the “common” VIMAGE framework into HEAD to allow easy virtualisation of other services.  That work has been sitting in perforce for a few years and simply needs updating for sysctls I think.
> 
> Then use that to virtualise things and have a vipc like we have vnets.  The good news is that you have identified most places and have the cleanup functions already so it’d be a matter of transforming your changes (assuming they are correct and working fine; haven’t actually read the patch in detail;-)  to the different infrastructure.  And that’s the easiest part.
> 
> 
> Bjoern

Hi Bjoern,
Thank you for your reply.

The "common" VIMAGE framework sounds good, I really want it.

I want to know what the IPC system looks like for user-land after virtualized,
and what happen if vnet like vipc is implemented.

For example, jail 1, 2, 3 join vipc group A, and jail 4, 5, 6 join vipc group B ??
Hmm, it looks good.

Regards,
Kikuchan