From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 24 15:10:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7456D16A420 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:10:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D0943D48 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:10:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1OFA69t003285 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:10:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1OFA632003284; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:10:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:10:06 GMT Message-Id: <200602241510.k1OFA632003284@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Kris Kennaway Cc: Subject: Re: kern/92440: Kernel fault in knote when getty opens a serial port X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kris Kennaway List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:10:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/92440; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kris Kennaway To: Paul Marciano Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/92440: Kernel fault in knote when getty opens a serial port Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:08:10 -0500 On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 11:38:49PM -0800, Paul Marciano wrote: > > --- Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 12:30:07AM +0000, Paul > > Marciano wrote: > > > > > >Description: > > > My systems all use serial consoles. Upon logging > > > out of a shell session I observed a kernel fault. > > > This has been reported before, I believe, but I > > > couldn't find a PR. > > > > I think this was fixed in 6.0-RELEASE. Can you > > confirm? > > > > Kris > > > > Kris, > > Thanks for the info, but unfortunately I'm not in a > position to be able to check out 6.0. We're on 5.4 > and will move to 5.5 when it is released but 6.0 is > regarded as immature (I would be interested in hearing > other opinions on that point). 6.0 is a much better release than both 5.4 and (confidently predicting into the future), 5.5. Any prejudice against it just because of the ".0" is unfounded. > I have looked at the kernel sources and see that the 6.0 serial > framework has changed. Yes, and unfortunately this bug will not be fixed in the 5.x series. Kris