Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:02:30 -0400 From: matt donovan <kitchetech@gmail.com> To: "Joseph S. Atkinson" <jsatkinson@embarqmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: State of the FreeBSD GNOME Project Message-ID: <28283d910903300502v46046a96u153eab009bfd2064@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <49D02996.5040003@embarqmail.com> References: <1238352818.73736.161.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <49CFEF9C.7000003@telenix.org> <28283d910903291816r2b2f2503h5241f987ef6bcebd@mail.gmail.com> <49D02996.5040003@embarqmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Joseph S. Atkinson < jsatkinson@embarqmail.com> wrote: > matt donovan wrote: > >> Well since Firefox3 is not a gecko port really. At least it does not run >> off >> of a gecko engine really I could update the firefox-devel ports or even >> firefox3 port but seems to me the firefox3 as a maintainer from what I >> have >> seen just that the firefox-devel port needs a maintainer and sicne I use >> firefox-devel already I could take that over if someone wishes. >> >> > Firefox is a Gecko. Everything from Mozilla Foundation is a Gecko. Gecko is > the underlying rendering engine that runs Mozilla, Firefox, Thundrbird, > Sunbird, Seamonkey, Fennic, XULRunner, and even external stuff like NVU and > KompoZer. I am sure there are more. > > Just a point of clarity on that. > thanks for clarifying that since, I just went with what mozilla says about xulrunner. I knwo xulrunner has gecko rendering engine in it but the upkeep is a bit different then a gecko application from what I have seen.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28283d910903300502v46046a96u153eab009bfd2064>