From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Sep 29 13:11:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA05269 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 13:11:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ppp1579.on.sympatico.ca (ppp1579.on.sympatico.ca [206.172.249.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA05262 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 13:11:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by ppp1669.on.sympatico.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA00235; Mon, 29 Sep 1997 16:06:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 16:06:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: jgrosch@superior.mooseriver.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Uh oh.. Time to take another look at the packages collection! In-Reply-To: <9231.875515867@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 28 Sep 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Unfortunately, I can't immediately think of any easy ways to implement > this. You could make 2 package CDs. The packages which are dependencies (ie. they are depended on by some other package) would go on both CDs, and the other packages depending on dependencies would go on both discs. This is a little wasteful, though... -- tIM...HOEk OPTIMIZATION: the process of using many one-letter variables names hoping that the resultant code will run faster.