From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 15 16:07:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4092416A4CE; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:07:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spiff.melthusia.org (spiff.melthusia.org [207.67.244.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A6E43D5D; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:07:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gtetlow@spiff.melthusia.org) Received: from spiff.melthusia.org (gtetlow@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spiff.melthusia.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5FG1AGc060758; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:01:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gtetlow@spiff.melthusia.org) Received: (from gtetlow@localhost) by spiff.melthusia.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i5FG1706060757; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:01:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gtetlow) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:01:07 -0700 From: Gordon Tetlow To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20040615160107.GT10016@spiff.melthusia.org> References: <200406132212.i5DMC3b9075832@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040614011012.H1600@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20040614010854.GA98360@dragon.nuxi.com> <40CCFCDF.4040303@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xi8lRpXYeGgNnUjs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40CCFCDF.4040303@freebsd.org> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org cc: Joseph Dunn Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/sound/pci emu10k1.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:07:55 -0000 --xi8lRpXYeGgNnUjs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:18:23PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > > > >Possibly. Still doesn't mean we shouldn't add the PCI ID to help people > >farther along in determining if it really works or not. If we get > >reliable failure reports in 5-CURRENT (which has a much updated driver > >from 5.2.1) we can print out an error message in the probe. > > >=20 > Well, this is kinda like finding a new Adaptec ID and adding it to the > ahc driver just because it's there, regardless of whether the driver can > talk to the chip. I would also argue that storage subsystems and sound cards are two very different class of devices. We can afford to be a little overzealous with sound hardware. If it doesn't work, it's not the end of the world. If a storage subsystem that is probed doesn't work (or worse, silently fails in subtle ways), that's much worse. -gordon --xi8lRpXYeGgNnUjs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAzx1DRu2t9DV9ZfsRAgkvAKC9pXbYfRVRRzcCtY2d0kwReM8d8gCfQp6C cGVp9rjGhBhRpG58v8wbwTk= =87gn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xi8lRpXYeGgNnUjs--