From owner-cvs-all Tue Aug 31 0:29:11 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from dfw-ix5.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix5.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3118D15031; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 00:29:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from smap@localhost) by dfw-ix5.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id CAA18210; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 02:29:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from sji-ca3-113.ix.netcom.com(209.109.233.113) by dfw-ix5.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id rma018185; Tue Aug 31 02:28:31 1999 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id AAA73022; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 00:28:27 -0700 (PDT) To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: Mark Murray , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/tn3270 - Imported sources References: <199908302027.NAA95382@freefall.freebsd.org> <19990830135351.A29899@dragon.nuxi.com> From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 31 Aug 1999 00:28:25 -0700 In-Reply-To: "David O'Brien"'s message of "Mon, 30 Aug 1999 13:53:51 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk * From: "David O'Brien" * For things like this, I think we really, really should have the source * code in the port itself. This way we can do a repository copy of the * originals to ports/net/tn3270/files/. Doing so would also let others * make modifications to the sources just like when they lived in src/. I disagree. Why take them out from src if we're going to carry the full source in the repository anyway? * Patches for our own source code (esp. that which used to live in src/) is * IMHO ridiculous. Not IMO. :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message