Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:45:39 +0900 (JST) From: Katsura Matsumoto <katsura@cc.osaka-kyoiku.ac.jp> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: hrs@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/68218: ports/print/dvipdfmx: fix for a dependency Message-ID: <200406230145.i5N1jdFv012735@gaia.cc.osaka-kyoiku.ac.jp> Resent-Message-ID: <200406230150.i5N1oPpH048734@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 68218 >Category: ports >Synopsis: ports/print/dvipdfmx: fix for a dependency >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed Jun 23 01:50:25 GMT 2004 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Katsura Matsumoto >Release: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p10 i386 >Organization: Osaka Kyoiku Univ. >Environment: System: FreeBSD gaia.cc.osaka-kyoiku.ac.jp 4.9-RELEASE-p10 >Description: The present dependency of print/dvipdfmx is not consistent with the recent restructuring on TeX-related ports: e.g., japanese/teTeX does not exactly require print/teTeX and print/dvipdfmx can lose its dependency to tetex. FYI, japanese/dvipdfm does not seem to meet the same issue at present because it depends on japanese/ptex-base. I suggest it would be better now that japanese/dvipdfm has also a dependency on tetex-base, though it may be a maintainer's decision. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: 21c21 < BUILD_DEPENDS= ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libkpathsea.a:${PORTSDIR}/print/teTeX --- > BUILD_DEPENDS= ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libkpathsea.a:${PORTSDIR}/print/teTeX-base 24c24 < kpsepath:${PORTSDIR}/print/teTeX --- > kpsepath:${PORTSDIR}/print/teTeX-base >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406230145.i5N1jdFv012735>