Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:45:39 +0900 (JST) From: Katsura Matsumoto <katsura@cc.osaka-kyoiku.ac.jp> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: hrs@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/68218: ports/print/dvipdfmx: fix for a dependency Message-ID: <200406230145.i5N1jdFv012735@gaia.cc.osaka-kyoiku.ac.jp> Resent-Message-ID: <200406230150.i5N1oPpH048734@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 68218
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: ports/print/dvipdfmx: fix for a dependency
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Wed Jun 23 01:50:25 GMT 2004
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Katsura Matsumoto
>Release: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p10 i386
>Organization:
Osaka Kyoiku Univ.
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD gaia.cc.osaka-kyoiku.ac.jp 4.9-RELEASE-p10
>Description:
The present dependency of print/dvipdfmx is not consistent with the recent
restructuring on TeX-related ports: e.g., japanese/teTeX does not exactly
require print/teTeX and print/dvipdfmx can lose its dependency to tetex.
FYI, japanese/dvipdfm does not seem to meet the same issue at present because
it depends on japanese/ptex-base. I suggest it would be better now that
japanese/dvipdfm has also a dependency on tetex-base, though it may be a
maintainer's decision.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
21c21
< BUILD_DEPENDS= ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libkpathsea.a:${PORTSDIR}/print/teTeX
---
> BUILD_DEPENDS= ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libkpathsea.a:${PORTSDIR}/print/teTeX-base
24c24
< kpsepath:${PORTSDIR}/print/teTeX
---
> kpsepath:${PORTSDIR}/print/teTeX-base
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406230145.i5N1jdFv012735>