Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 09:48:06 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280674] multimedia/x265-3.5_3 fails checksum on x265-asm-warnings.patch Message-ID: <bug-280674-7788-YZEIjhEgZK@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-280674-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-280674-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280674 Mike Bristow <mike@urgle.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mike@urgle.com --- Comment #2 from Mike Bristow <mike@urgle.com> --- I have a copy of the original x265-asm-warnings-patch and the one that can = be currently downloaded from bitbucket: : mike@cheddar:~ ; fetch -o x265-asm-warnings.patch https://bitbucket.org/multicoreware/x265_git/commits/8f18e3ad32684eee95e885= e718655f93951128c3/raw/ x265-asm-warnings.patch 4526 B 81 MBps = 00s : mike@cheddar:~ ; diff -ur x265-asm-warnings.patch /usr/ports/distfiles/x265-asm-warnings.patch=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20 --- x265-asm-warnings.patch 2024-08-08 06:31:26.000000000 +0100 +++ /usr/ports/distfiles/x265-asm-warnings.patch 2024-08-08 10:23:19.169039000 +0100 @@ -142,5 +142,5 @@ %elif %1=3D=3D4 SBUTTERFLY qdq, %3, %4, %5 --=20 -2.45.2 +2.45.0 With this, I think that it is fairly easy to validate that the checksum mismatch is benign, and the checksums can be regenerated safely. I have no idea why bitbucket have changed the raw commit, but that is a con= cern --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-280674-7788-YZEIjhEgZK>