From owner-freebsd-doc Sat Apr 25 22:45:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA21139 for freebsd-doc-outgoing; Sat, 25 Apr 1998 22:45:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gamma.aei.ca (root@gamma.aei.ca [206.123.6.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA21133 for ; Sat, 25 Apr 1998 22:45:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from malartre@aei.ca) Received: from aei.ca (Chuck@dialB01.aei.ca [206.123.6.85]) by gamma.aei.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA00959 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 1998 01:45:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3542C9CE.269ED5A8@aei.ca> Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 01:44:46 -0400 From: Malartre X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: WIDTH=600 again! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have lost (doh!) the mail where someone replyed me to width=600. He was saying than it was not good for browser interpretation of the HTML page. I was explaning why a sentence with 30 words where not good: the human is an animal who normaly read book. Open any book, there is no more than 8-14 words for each sentence. Most of the professionnal page are made with a WIDTH=600 Like www.sun.com www.intel.com
www.linux.org
www.news.com
www.zdnet.com www.wired.com ok, I can give you a lot if you want ;-) So I suggest than freebsd.org will be re-made with that rule of width=600. Malartre Sorry for my bad english -- -------------------------------------------------- malartre@aei.ca ICQ #4224434 www.aei.ca/~malartre/ FreeBSD 4 Newbies project Windows_95-B Unix FreeBSD-2.2.5 -------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message