Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 10:47:14 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Tobias C. Berner" <tcberner@FreeBSD.org>, portmgr@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r423237 - head/Mk/Uses Message-ID: <20161004104714.GA6232@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20161004120415.010a5d9e@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <201610040618.u946IWiR015188@repo.freebsd.org> <20161004120415.010a5d9e@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 12:04:15PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > ... > Can't we just use lib/pkgconfig already? Having to patch every port > to move it to libdata is pointless extra work. Nobody cares that these > files are in libdata. Well I kind of do. These files are not libraries (code) but data, so it naturally belongs to `libdata', alongside with `ldconfig[32]'. Is there any rational explanation why most GNU/Linux distros put them in `lib' (apart from lack of thought in the first place)? ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161004104714.GA6232>