From owner-freebsd-security Tue May 8 11:16:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from scribble.fsn.hu (scribble.fsn.hu [193.224.40.95]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8548237B42C for ; Tue, 8 May 2001 11:16:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bra@fsn.hu) Received: (qmail 61544 invoked by uid 1000); 8 May 2001 18:09:36 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 May 2001 18:09:36 -0000 Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 20:09:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Attila Nagy To: Subject: Re: Jails and FreeBSD4.3 In-Reply-To: <20010507132904.E33043@moo.udder.org> Message-ID: <20010508200734.B61277-100000@scribble.fsn.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, > Yeah, it would be nice if you could bind the jail to a list of IPs > or whatever. It seems like it would be the kind of functionality that > would be desired by more people than just be. Right now, it's the > only thing preventing me from moving anything over to a jail. Almost > every service I run needs more than one IP.My $0.02. I misunderstood hte original question, I thought of a name based apache vhost running on multiple IPs, not IP based vhosts... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attila Nagy e-mail: Attila.Nagy@fsn.hu Budapest Polytechnic (BMF.HU) @work: +361 210 1415 (194) H-1084 Budapest, Tavaszmezo u. 15-17. cell.: +3630 306 6758 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message