From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Aug 25 8:32:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from icicle.winternet.com (icicle.winternet.com [198.174.169.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBDC37B440 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 08:32:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tundra.winternet.com (nrahlstr@tundra.winternet.com [198.174.169.11]) by icicle.winternet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3mc) with ESMTP id KAA28284; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 10:32:42 -0500 (CDT) SMTP "HELO" (ESMTP) greeting from tundra.winternet.com But _really_ from :: nrahlstr@tundra.winternet.com [198.174.169.11] SMTP "MAIL From" = nrahlstr@mail.winternet.com (Nathan Ahlstrom) SMTP "RCPT To" = Received: (from nrahlstr@localhost) by tundra.winternet.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) id KAA18275; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 10:32:41 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 10:32:41 -0500 From: Nathan Ahlstrom To: Warner Losh Cc: Vivek Khera , FreeBSD Stable List Subject: Re: nuking "unsafe" protocols (was Re: Upcoming rc.conf changes not loading certain currently loaded daemons) Message-ID: <20000825103240.A18222@winternet.com> Mail-Followup-To: Warner Losh , Vivek Khera , FreeBSD Stable List References: <200008241201.IAA32736@sanson.reyes.somos.net> <20000824080419.B51628@dazed.slacker.com> <14757.15655.515615.780499@onceler.kciLink.com> <20000824162123.A80150@irrelevant.org> <14757.16490.269381.416596@onceler.kciLink.com> <20000824163533.B80150@irrelevant.org> <14757.17729.113055.693358@onceler.kciLink.com> <20000824110414.C12752@winternet.com> <200008250322.VAA31765@billy-club.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200008250322.VAA31765@billy-club.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 09:22:11PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20000824110414.C12752@winternet.com> Nathan Ahlstrom writes: > : This PR may be of interest. > : http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=15830 > > Actually, no. It isn't that interesting. More interesting would be > something like the following which does it for all rcmd based things. > It is out of OpenBSD, and likely needs a couple of tweaks before it > can be committed. Much more generic. :-) > > Comments? I agree. I will try out your patch this weekend. -- Nathan Ahlstrom / nrahlstr@winternet.com / nra@FreeBSD.org / PGP: 0x67BC9D19 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message