From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 28 09:45:58 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479C3106568D
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:45:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.vega.ru (mail.vega.ru [90.156.167.5])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B9E8FC2A
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:45:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.100.124.99] (port=54526 helo=edoofus.dev.vega.ru)
	by mail.vega.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <ru@FreeBSD.org>)
	id 1MsCRp-000Cnx-NE; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:23:09 +0400
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:22:38 +0400
From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To: CmdLnKid <cmdlnkid@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090928092238.GA68319@edoofus.dev.vega.ru>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0909272328400.62818@qvzrafvba.5c.ybpny>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0909272328400.62818@qvzrafvba.5c.ybpny>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: locate(1) ZFS addition
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:45:58 -0000

On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:37:14PM -0400, CmdLnKid wrote:
> I just came across what I believe to be just a oversight on locate(1). By 
> default as stated in its locate.rc file in /etc it states that the default 
> file systems that will be searched is "ufs ext2fs".
> 
> Would it be wise to have the 
> default be "ufs zfs xfs ext2fs" ? or some other combination.
> 
> PS: Should a PR be filed for this ?

The default list is actually "ufs ext2fs zfs" for RELENG_7 now,
it's just that the comment hasn't been updated.  For HEAD and
RELENG_8, "the default list contains all local file systems that
are not synthetic, loopback mounts, or read-only, according to
lsvfs."


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer