From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 3 13:25:18 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA22093 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 3 Jun 1995 13:25:18 -0700 Received: from w8hd.w8hd.org (w8hd.w8hd.org [198.252.159.10]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA22080 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 1995 13:25:15 -0700 Received: (from kimc@localhost) by w8hd.w8hd.org (8.6.12/w8hd) id QAA22008; Sat, 3 Jun 1995 16:25:13 -0400 Date: Sat, 3 Jun 1995 16:25:10 -0400 (EDT) From: kim culhan To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail 8.6.12 on -current In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Earlier today I posted re. sendmail 8.6.12 on -current and these complaints from conf.c: > conf.c: In function `setupmaps': > conf.c:353: warning: prototype for `host_map_init' follows > conf.c:253: warning: non-prototype definition here > conf.c: In function `setproctitle': > conf.c:1077: `NKPDE' undeclared (first use this function) > conf.c:1077: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > conf.c:1077: for each function it appears in.) > conf.c:1077: `pt_entry_t' undeclared (first use this function) > *** Error code 1 Later today I tried sup on freefall again and freefall sup'd what appears to be the 8.6.11 version of sendmail which contains a different conf.c The question: Is this patched conf.c compatible with the latest sendmail version on ftp.cs.berkeley.edu? regards kim -- kimc@w8hd.org