From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 7 20:22:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43AB5828 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x230.google.com (mail-la0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF87321EA for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 20:22:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id gl10so3984158lab.35 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 13:22:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zLOuYisenIpL4LKpmnoXh6an4v51zDb8u9PdOFn3Ywg=; b=BG+0CdS6rTDdAh+hjAHNqqg0MPWmDJzpMVdie9WSs6Wf4/tG/wMj+Np5zcZW+tSggS vQHR5lptdA/EYxqUdVbcZ4v9LUq2kPVSbw2OU0u1M+pkoNgLPQE3atrM/QMn1uhxdBBg Ww/qxBuRq2BJDkpanlEpnFBTV1I2wL4YLq7zoWktYDat7/aWi0HX8y84k4tNAbzK7NDy WY79dzv31E2Yx4zU0s6atgA4WG4KQlhYG5f9goZDM/vgAq25bWF/ZMyREJirnGX6TK7N 2+91+hEbqndPtEwUz6X1OJvIdfChbl+SOh5GKrKQgBzWCuM1qJPwMnaCu8rBu/q8WqCb MAHw== X-Received: by 10.112.63.65 with SMTP id e1mr3671109lbs.81.1407442964057; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 13:22:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from notebook.com (38-45-134-95.pool.ukrtel.net. [95.134.45.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dk4sm1176139lbb.38.2014.08.07.13.22.42 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Aug 2014 13:22:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Artyom Mirgorodskiy To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A few linux-f20 ports and Skype 4.3 Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 23:22:59 +0300 Message-ID: <7823503.bJyWCWreeT@notebook.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (FreeBSD/11.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.12.5; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20140807194357.GA14138@halon.org.uk> References: <20140807194357.GA14138@halon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 20:22:47 -0000 How I should prepare pulse audio? Previous version of Skype (including 4.2.0.11) hold if linux pulse audio libs is present in system On Thursday 07 August 2014 20:43:57 Vassilis Laganakos wrote: > Hello, > > I hope this is the right place to email about the Linux emulation > layer. > > It was identified in the recent Cambrige Dev Summit the need to keep f10 > base working as well as add Centos6, Centos7 and Fedora 20. xmj is working > on f10 and AllanJude on Centos6 and Centos7, last time we discussed about it. > > So I put together a few linux-f20 ports at: https://github.com/vassilisl/freebsd-linux_base-f20 > that seem to be enough to have run the Skype 4.3 port that I've placed at: > https://github.com/vassilisl/freebsd-ports/tree/master/net-im/skype4 > > The test environment is the lemul branch (put together by dchagin) on an > AMD64 box, where currently linux and linux32 have beed decoupled from > linprocfs, linsysfs and linux_common. Both linux32 and linux kernel modules > were loaded at the same time, when skype4 launched and signed in with a test > account. > > The linux-f20- ports are not polished, I need at least to fill in their > interdependencies and conflicts with existing ports; they have however been > checked with portlint. Currently only the i686 part is present. > I plan to extend them with their respective x86_64 parts, which in the past > have been used to get the ARM Foundation Model work on top of the 64bit > linux emulation layer. > > Hope somebody finds this useful! Once the ports are in a better state and > closer to submit quality I'll send them over with send-pr. > > Please let me know what you think :) > > Regards, > Vassilis > > -- Artyom Mirgorodskiy