From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 7 17:29:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D522816A4CE for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:29:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp815.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp815.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 992A743D58 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:29:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com) (jtinnin@pacbell.net@64.173.27.163 with login) by smtp815.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Feb 2005 17:29:21 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:29:19 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502061420.24415.krinklyfig@spymac.com> <1069313008.20050207173736@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <1069313008.20050207173736@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502070929.19710.krinklyfig@spymac.com> cc: Anthony Atkielski Subject: Re: favor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:29:21 -0000 On Monday 07 February 2005 08:37 am, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Eric Kjeldergaard writes: > > EK> To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the > EK> freebsd-questions Archives. > EK> > EK> Since we are discussing implicit contracts, I would think that > the EK> announcement that the collection of prior postings is linked > to and EK> mentioned/described to be reasonable notification that the > mailing EK> list gets archived. > > It's not. And there must be no other way of subscribing in order for > this method to be valid, anyway. > > Why do you think that software companies and Web sites and other > organizations require you to check a box to accept terms and > conditions, instead of just assuming that you read and understand > them when they are displayed? Since this is a volunteer organization, and it seems to me that you have the most interest in it, and if you refuse to let this go, then I have a suggestion. Hire a lawyer and write up a legally sound plan, and then submit it. Until then, you're demanding things of people that simply aren't going to happen, just because you demand it. - jt