From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Sep 11 17:49:31 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA13524
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 17:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA13519
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 17:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA08947; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 17:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
To: Branson Matheson <branson.matheson@ferginc.com>
cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ATTN Emacs users; new Zile release 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 11 Sep 1997 14:02:20 EDT."
             <Pine.NEB.3.96.970911135833.433O-100000@toth.hq.ferg.com> 
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 17:49:33 -0700
Message-ID: <8943.874025373@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Hmmm... I for one would not want it to be the standard editor. Vi is
> and always has been the standard editor for unix. I think it should

I think you misunderstand.  This doesn't replace vi and never did.
ee is a *different* editor, for a different audience, and the fact
that you symlink it to vi on your own box is completely and utterly
irrelevant to that fact. :)

					Jordan