From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 7 17:03:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4E31B0A for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 17:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oj.bangj.com (amt0.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE3CB1E7D for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 17:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.25.105] (69-77-129-4.static.skybest.com [69.77.129.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F37B13095; Sun, 7 Sep 2014 12:54:02 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1974.6\)) Subject: Re: RFC 7217 From: Tom Pusateri In-Reply-To: <21515.36548.561554.872920@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 12:53:58 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2354C099-C801-43D2-8EE9-0DA0AAAD8181@bangj.com> References: <21515.36548.561554.872920@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> To: Garrett Wollman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1974.6) Cc: FreeBSD Net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 17:03:14 -0000 I read the draft and wasn't sure what problem they were trying to solve. = They talk about moving from network to network which seems aimed at = laptops or mobile devices. But randomizing the interface id but keeping = it the same on a particular network allows consistency on each network = but you could still be tracked on that network (like using the MAC = address) even though you couldn't be tracked across networks (unlike = using the MAC address). Why not just use temporary addresses (RFC 4941)? On the server side, this draft could be implemented in rtadvd. Not sure = who maintains that. Is that what you're looking for? To see if someone is working on changes = to rtadvd? Thanks, Tom > On Sep 6, 2014, at 6:46 PM, Garrett Wollman = wrote: >=20 > So is anyone working on an RFC 7217 ("Stable and Opaque IIDs with > SLAAC") implementation for FreeBSD yet? >=20 > -GAWollman >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"