Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 12:53:58 -0400 From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RFC 7217 Message-ID: <2354C099-C801-43D2-8EE9-0DA0AAAD8181@bangj.com> In-Reply-To: <21515.36548.561554.872920@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> References: <21515.36548.561554.872920@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I read the draft and wasn't sure what problem they were trying to solve. =
They talk about moving from network to network which seems aimed at =
laptops or mobile devices. But randomizing the interface id but keeping =
it the same on a particular network allows consistency on each network =
but you could still be tracked on that network (like using the MAC =
address) even though you couldn't be tracked across networks (unlike =
using the MAC address).
Why not just use temporary addresses (RFC 4941)?
On the server side, this draft could be implemented in rtadvd. Not sure =
who maintains that.
Is that what you're looking for? To see if someone is working on changes =
to rtadvd?
Thanks,
Tom
> On Sep 6, 2014, at 6:46 PM, Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org> =
wrote:
>=20
> So is anyone working on an RFC 7217 ("Stable and Opaque IIDs with
> SLAAC") implementation for FreeBSD yet?
>=20
> -GAWollman
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2354C099-C801-43D2-8EE9-0DA0AAAD8181>