From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Sep  9 22: 2:56 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-30-103.research.att.com [135.207.30.103])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB60D1524B
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Sep 1999 22:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from fenner@research.att.com)
Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26])
	by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 284D41E004; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 01:02:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46])
	by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA19371;
	Fri, 10 Sep 1999 01:02:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Received: (from fenner@localhost)
	by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id WAA29797;
	Thu, 9 Sep 1999 22:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199909100502.WAA29797@windsor.research.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: pavlin@catarina.usc.edu
Subject: Re: Patching the patches?
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 22:02:23 -0700
Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.2e/makemail 2.8u
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


Check out benchmarks/netperf for a port that tries to handle
hardcoded "/usr/local" paths in the source.

I think the mh port needs to sed conf/FreeBSD in a similar way.

  Bill


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message