Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 13:55:07 -0600 From: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> To: yuri@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r471061 - head/audio/qjackctl Message-ID: <62c0a9b6-e561-3835-450d-a6430295ff5d@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <0cd44f35-c134-f143-b4e6-56b816f4938f@freebsd.org> References: <201805281845.w4SIj8bO065379@repo.freebsd.org> <985846ee-dce7-d8f1-2813-0a28bc36217e@freebsd.org> <a328123e-8f85-6d68-1d9d-b7454b53fe25@freebsd.org> <5dddd567-3439-caa3-56d0-665a40bdbf35@freebsd.org> <77503afc-b631-ac32-a87b-c8a28e0bb2ab@freebsd.org> <d42ac45a-2357-630a-8a0d-6864f271d4a9@freebsd.org> <0cd44f35-c134-f143-b4e6-56b816f4938f@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --8ss2Qa3IVGk157KOr0rr3ppWo9HePzaK1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8CBjIwoHvL112gFtfaeaSwgDQ9YU25QJR"; protected-headers="v1" From: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> To: yuri@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Message-ID: <62c0a9b6-e561-3835-450d-a6430295ff5d@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r471061 - head/audio/qjackctl References: <201805281845.w4SIj8bO065379@repo.freebsd.org> <985846ee-dce7-d8f1-2813-0a28bc36217e@freebsd.org> <a328123e-8f85-6d68-1d9d-b7454b53fe25@freebsd.org> <5dddd567-3439-caa3-56d0-665a40bdbf35@freebsd.org> <77503afc-b631-ac32-a87b-c8a28e0bb2ab@freebsd.org> <d42ac45a-2357-630a-8a0d-6864f271d4a9@freebsd.org> <0cd44f35-c134-f143-b4e6-56b816f4938f@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <0cd44f35-c134-f143-b4e6-56b816f4938f@freebsd.org> --8CBjIwoHvL112gFtfaeaSwgDQ9YU25QJR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/28/18 13:45, Yuri wrote: > On 05/28/18 12:35, Sean Bruno wrote: >> I didn't know I was complaining.=C2=A0 I thought I was asking about a = change >> you made and trying to engage in a civil conversation about it. >=20 > I didn't mean to use the word "complaining" in an uncivilized way. :-) > I just meant that I didn't see anybody to express such opinion before. >=20 No worries. >=20 >> This happens quite a lot actually. I don't find this argument valid. >> Is there information from Portmgr or the team that maintains/works on = QT >> saying that QT4 is going to be deprecated?=C2=A0 I couldn't find one i= f it >> exists. >=20 > It seems reasonable to me to delete the option, it doesn't seem > reasonable to you. > Let portmgr decide what should happen in this case. :-) >=20 >=20 > Yuri >=20 >=20 Yeah, I think there is some discussion to be had here. I don't like port maintainers like yourself having to add "yet another options" to do test builds with. E.g. doing builds against QT4/QT5 *and* all the various architectures and versions of FreeBSD. Making maintenance burdens *lower* is something that we should try to make happen. sean --8CBjIwoHvL112gFtfaeaSwgDQ9YU25QJR-- --8ss2Qa3IVGk157KOr0rr3ppWo9HePzaK1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE6MTp+IA1BOHj9Lo0veT1/om1/LYFAlsMXptfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEU4 QzRFOUY4ODAzNTA0RTFFM0Y0QkEzNEJERTRGNUZFODlCNUZDQjYACgkQveT1/om1 /LY30Af/XASxJekeptwjVrzSBs1IDZuj8ZW1n+nd5yja5nJVoI7CPbRTKr3lxTL3 UpR99WOwhWmp67Dlajndwb2mcTHpse1D21gBoBk4k+R+fnUnL/bYnfXCDNWxNmu1 oN6RsnD/WpDJ3fSdWW94TiGmu9juvhuFWGSEy3lPyLVQhTjUtBZWKXmQa/xakW51 r2CUaA9ysDFlIl5kY0V2y2AvX+17cRXMU7zWtcbwsqrV/dNk5n/ya7buWb7b5NT1 6e7me8pFingcKSzGqsanwok+gNVdc2VpnJjRWV/n9YKTt0tr4Qqni90RcYDb3BOM wSfkjpUG2LUqCEJa6oFRzXt924+hAg== =WKVe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8ss2Qa3IVGk157KOr0rr3ppWo9HePzaK1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?62c0a9b6-e561-3835-450d-a6430295ff5d>