From nobody Tue Mar 10 18:38:35 2026 X-Original-To: questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4fVjM46k8bz6Tqjg for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 18:38:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: from puchar.net (puchar.net [194.1.144.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4fVjM41qDwz41n6 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 18:38:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by puchar.net (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 62AIcaj2049797 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Mar 2026 19:38:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=puchar.net; s=default; t=1773167916; bh=ZpFYzE3PJW4RMkBinyQCq5+arKw5PA/0XXInOwoeeNY=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=R3SyakkQORozH4tf88zd7bTNTS+bx2spw7SAcWkr6Y1/7/jgamKSCf8lz15UtrxmT DBhMf9IFav68tu5tnhcjEgwhrwuJWQmMVIJX6iChh5puFWnyELGwCX9Gb+c27WSJgT 2aCHrAUHovbP4Iq6/V26YP8kK9ploFMWZOJY/b6w= Received: from wojtek.intra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.intra (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 62AIcZva041503; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 19:38:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.intra (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) with ESMTP id 62AIcZI2041500; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 19:38:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net) X-Authentication-Warning: wojtek.intra: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 19:38:35 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Ralf Mardorf cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: parental control app for open-source desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <61941794-4890-8376-efe-7ed142f5357b@puchar.net> References: <83c7a7e-1857-e9f7-49bf-167b7cb4f7de@puchar.net> List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:43476, ipnet:194.1.144.0/24, country:PL] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4fVjM41qDwz41n6 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- On Tue, 10 Mar 2026, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Tue, 2026-03-10 at 14:06 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> On Tue, 2026-03-10 at 12:49 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>>>> anyone who have even basic understanding of internet knows that >>>>> such solution doesn't exist. Unless that computer will not be >>>>> internet connected, or maybe within private intranet/VPN. >>>> >>>> https://cybernews.com/best-parental-control-apps/android/ >>> People that give smartphones to children should be punished >> >> Unfortunately, it is very difficult to get by without a smartphone or >> at least a feature phone > > I use a jailbroken iPad, Wi-Fi without cellular support. Jailbreaking > never brings any real advantages, so the idea of offering children a BSD > and/or Linux computer is pretty good. Government regulations are > ridiculous, so it would be good if we as the FLOSS community could show > how to do it right. Can we do it? I'll take a look at myself too. > > > you are all crazy.