From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 21 06:27:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D594B106564A for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:27:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B926B8FC68 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.12] (pool-71-109-162-173.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.109.162.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n7L5tNuC047799 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:55:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Message-Id: <69165A28-4E22-4D6D-B21E-1BD4A3025B0A@lafn.org> From: Doug Hardie To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:55:22 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Possible bug with IPv6 ICMPv6 handling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:27:42 -0000 I have found what to me seems like a bug with ICMPv6 handling in IPv6. However, before submitting a PR I wanted to check to be sure that its not a misunderstanding on my part. The network setup. A host (A) connected to a router (B) connected to another host (C) on a separate network. When all are up and running, A can ping6 to C and gets a response. If you power off C and then do the ping again, tpcdump on A shows an ICMPv6 destination unreachable datagram received from B. However ping6 does not report that back to the user. A ktrace of ping6 shows that it does not receive the ICMPv6 response. Its my understanding that it should and the ping6 code seems to imply that also. Is this a bug?