From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 12:10:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA92F1065673 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:10:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pj@smo.de) Received: from ilk.de (mx-out22.ilk.de [194.121.104.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BD98FC0C for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:10:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pj@smo.de) Received: from bologna.intern.smo.de (pool14.ka.ilk.net [212.86.194.14]) by ilk.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/ilk-relay) with ESMTP id n11CAuGo030142; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:10:56 +0100 Received: from [192.168.153.208] (herdubreid.intern.smo.de [192.168.153.208]) by bologna.intern.smo.de (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n11C2GvN029960; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:02:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <49859187.2030407@smo.de> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:11:51 +0100 From: Philipp Ost User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20090125 X-Accept-Language: de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bf2006a@yahoo.com References: <763068.66528.qm@web39104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <763068.66528.qm@web39104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, giffunip@tutopia.com Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it becomestandard compiler?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:11:00 -0000 bf wrote: >>>The issue is a lot of open source applications that it can run are >>>GPL licensed. I know there was an effort to replace the core OS apps >>>that were GPL with 100% BSD licensed equivalents. > > >>The effort didn't go far enough. Why haven't we removed GNU readline ? > > >>Pedro. > > > I think you know very well why we haven't removed that, and other > pieces of software with the GPL from the tree: no one has written and > submitted suitable replacements with more permissive licenses. [...] What about the editline library ? I have to admit I don't know how well it works, but I haven't used readline either... Philipp