From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 11 14:26:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D638037B480; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5591E43FB1; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:26:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3BLQcpH024153; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 23:26:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3BLQcip024152; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 23:26:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 23:26:38 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: Ade Lovett Message-ID: <20030411212638.GA24100@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20030411194543.GA23351@freebie.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-OS: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Ade Lovett Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT access X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 21:26:44 -0000 On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 03:52:21PM -0500, Ade Lovett wrote: > On 4/11/03 14:45, "Wilko Bulte" wrote: > > Removing oneself from the various access* files has become a new > > fashion it appears. What do people think the gain is from doing this? > > Well, according to a Mister Grim Reaper, it takes up "valuable resources" of > varying forms. > > Of course, I immediately subscribed to the public cvs-src@ list, so as to > keep getting the src/ commits, so I'm not too sure what the overall point > was, other than to be a "good committer" -- I am assuming, of course, that > my src/ commit bit is just 'retired' by this action, and would be re-enabled > as and when appropriate. Well, the reason why I bring this up is that some folks email core that they want to hand in their commit bit for safekeeping whereas other folks just do a commit on access*. I don't mind either way, but I think it would be better to formally notify the hats (core, portmgr, doceng) that is responsible for handing out the bits. For the src commit bits I include this in the core report so that if need be there is a reference once the bit requested back. (sjeez, it starts to sound like a company out here.. :-} ) W/ -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte