From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Sep 12 17:37:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from toad.com (toad.com [140.174.2.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AF637B423 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 17:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grok.localnet (unknown@cr479972-a.rct1.bc.wave.home.com [24.113.37.168]) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA26902 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 17:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by grok.localnet (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 29CDE212E07; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 17:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 17:37:31 -0700 From: Steve Reid To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: nic questions Message-ID: <20000912173731.A422@grok.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anybody recognize this? fxp0: warning: unsupported PHY, type = 0, addr = 0 What causes it? The card seems to be working fine although I haven't stress-tested it. FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE (will be 4.1-R RSN). dmesg info below. fxp0 is connected to a cable modem, xl0 has not been connected to anything yet. Also: 3Com 3c509B vs "IBM 10/100 Ether Jet PCI Management Adapter" (i82559)? I can get more of each for $25 CDN each (used I'm sure) and am wondering which is best. fxp0: rev 0x08 int a irq 11 on pci0.9.0 xl0: <3Com 3c905B-TX Fast Etherlink XL> rev 0x30 int a irq 11 on pci0.17.0 using shared irq11. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message