From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 18 7:50:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218F31558B for ; Tue, 18 May 1999 07:50:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id HAA14386; Tue, 18 May 1999 07:50:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 07:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199905181450.HAA14386@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Jacques Vidrine Subject: Re: ports/11756: update port: xchat-0.9.5 to 0.9.6 Reply-To: Jacques Vidrine Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/11756; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jacques Vidrine To: jim@blues.ghis.net Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/11756: update port: xchat-0.9.5 to 0.9.6 Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 09:41:41 -0500 On 18 May 1999 at 18:13, jim@phrantic.phear.net wrote: > Patch updates xchat port from 0.9.5 to 0.9.6 and turns off GNOME panel > support which is compiled in by default with the new version. The correct behavior would be to compile in GNOME and GNOME panel support if GNOME is installed. If that's too much trouble, then the port Makefile should, at a minimum, honor a USE_GNOME make flag, which could safely default to "NO". Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.cc / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message