From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 14 14:28:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACD916A4CE for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 14:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hanoi.cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B8C43D45 for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 14:28:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by hanoi.cronyx.ru id i4ELQ4Wj062578 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org.checked; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Sat, 15 May 2004 01:26:04 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: from cronyx.ru (rik.cronyx.ru [172.22.4.1]) by hanoi.cronyx.ru with ESMTP id i4ELOfX8062511; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Sat, 15 May 2004 01:24:46 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Message-ID: <40A537C8.1010407@cronyx.ru> Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 01:19:04 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ru-RU; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030426 X-Accept-Language: ru-ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Evans References: <40A26162.9030607@cronyx.ru> <20040512.200542.09569104.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040513155109.GB6572@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <40A4E2CB.2000007@cronyx.ru> <20040515041301.O22881@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20040515041301.O22881@gamplex.bde.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Marcel Moolenaar Subject: Re: Sio & Puc memory mapped X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 21:28:50 -0000 Bruce Evans пишет: >On Fri, 14 May 2004, Roman Kurakin wrote: > > >>May I ask you to make some tests for me? >> >>We have a set of tests, which we use for testings of our async >>adapters. I add support for one of ours cards via puc(4)&uart(4) >>drivers. These tests works fine with patches for sio(4) driver (was >>tested with 5.2 sio), but fails with puc(4)&uart(4). >> >>I don't have any other cards supported by uart(4), so I can't test >>it by my self. If you have a time and ability, I'll send these tests >>for you. >> >> >Why not just use sio? It has been tested for hundreds if not thousands >of programmer hours in various versions over the last 16 years. uart >fails even simple tests, and has low performance. > I second. Sio works just fine with mem-maped cards after small patch. rik > >Bruce >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > >