Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 21:00:56 +0100 From: Bjarne Wichmann Petersen <freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk> To: Randall Hopper <aa8vb@nc.rr.com>, freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenGL Message-ID: <20020104195955.KBLQ11568.fepC.post.tele.dk@there> In-Reply-To: <20020104141846.A31212@nc.rr.com> References: <20020103212324.ILQT16766.fepD.post.tele.dk@there> <20020104185158.RCWJ16766.fepD.post.tele.dk@there> <20020104141846.A31212@nc.rr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 04 January 2002 20:18, Randall Hopper wrote: > From the XFree86 port patches, it appears: config/cf/FreeBSD.cf > is the place. The current port turns off optimization by removing the -O2 > and -O on DefaultGcc2i386Opt and OptimizedCDebugFlags, respectively. Hmm... I read somewhere that it generally wasn't advisable to do any optimization above -O... or was that just for kernel/world-build? > |Have you tried tuxracer or gltron? In tuxracer I can't push more than > |9-11 FPS on average. And the pusling part, it the same whether I run it > |at 640x480 or 1600x1200. > > Not yet, but I will. Let me rebuild and dig around some more to see what I > can tweak. Let me hear what you dig out eventually... ;) > Say, also I'm running with the XFree86 DRI mga.ko module, not the > SourceForge DRI modules, and I didn't compile in the Matrox HAL library. > I'd be interested in which DRI modules you are using, and whether you've > got the HAL built into your server. I'm using the drm-kernelmodules from ports. And I've also tried running with the matrox HAL, but recompiled some days ago without to check whether there was any difference. With tuxracer it was the same, haven't tested with glxgear though. Bjarne -- Homepage: http://www.mekanix.dk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020104195955.KBLQ11568.fepC.post.tele.dk>