Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:40:21 GMT From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/68512: [ patch ] x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: remove unneeded run deps and docs fix Message-ID: <200406301540.i5UFeLot051640@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/68512; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/68512: [ patch ] x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: remove unneeded run deps and docs fix Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:36:25 -0400 >> (06.30.2004 @ 0849 PST): Roman Bogorodskiy said, in 5.3K: << > 1. bsetbg is not needed becouse there is fbsetbg in the fluxbox > distro and most their options are common. Not really. fbsetbg can only set a background to an image, and cannot set the background to a texture. bsetbg can only set a background to a texture, and cannot set the background to an image. > - A few words about docs: if fluxbox-devel configured without html and > pdf docs support, the docs dir will not be created, but there is an > entry for it in pkg-plist: @dirrm %%DOCSDIR%%. It'll couse warning on > deinstall. Agreed. %%PORTDOCS%%@dirrm %%DOCSDIR%% is the way to go. > IMHO, it's better to install the standart docs (NEWS, > AUTHORS, etc) when NOPORTDOCS is not defined. If NOPORTDOCS is defined, > we dissallow for user to install html or pdf docs (maybe even some > warrning message should be displayed when WITH_DOC(PDF|HTML) and > NOPORTDOCS displayed together?). Why? A user has to manually specify WITH_DOC*. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406301540.i5UFeLot051640>