Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:40:21 GMT
From:      Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/68512: [ patch ] x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: remove unneeded run deps and docs fix
Message-ID:  <200406301540.i5UFeLot051640@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/68512; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>
To: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/68512: [ patch ] x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: remove unneeded run deps and docs fix
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:36:25 -0400

 >> (06.30.2004 @ 0849 PST): Roman Bogorodskiy said, in 5.3K: <<
 > 		1. bsetbg is not needed becouse there is fbsetbg in the fluxbox
 > 		   distro and most their options are common.
 
 Not really. fbsetbg can only set a background to an image, and cannot
 set the background to a texture. bsetbg can only set a background to a
 texture, and cannot set the background to an image.
 
 > 	- A few words about docs: if fluxbox-devel configured without html and 
 > 	pdf docs support, the docs dir will not be created, but there is an
 > 	entry for it in pkg-plist: @dirrm %%DOCSDIR%%. It'll couse warning on 
 > 	deinstall.
 
 Agreed. %%PORTDOCS%%@dirrm %%DOCSDIR%% is the way to go.
 
 >	IMHO, it's better to install the standart docs (NEWS, 
 > 	AUTHORS, etc) when NOPORTDOCS is not defined. If NOPORTDOCS is defined,
 > 	we dissallow for user to install html or pdf docs (maybe even some 
 > 	warrning message should be displayed when WITH_DOC(PDF|HTML) and
 > 	NOPORTDOCS displayed together?).  
 
 Why? A user has to manually specify WITH_DOC*.
 
 # Adam
 
 
 --
 Adam Weinberger
 adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org
 adamw@vectors.cx    ||   adamw@gnome.org
 http://www.vectors.cx



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406301540.i5UFeLot051640>