From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 4 17:06:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B21A16A416 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BCA13C469 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id E15685F2; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:06:19 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:06:19 -0600 To: Jeremy Messenger Message-ID: <20070104170619.GA21490@soaustin.net> References: <20070103061203.CA59916A412@hub.freebsd.org> <20070103224616.GB16719@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: Mark Linimon , freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: spam detection notification X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:06:20 -0000 On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 05:38:13PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > It sounds like someone need to make an improvement of info in the body > message. It doesn't explain very clear such as not everybody know what URL > and need to change from 'freebsd-bugs mailing list' to 'bugmeister@'. The doc pages about problem report handling guidelines include this information. If you want to follow up to a particular PR, you use the bug-followup address. If you have a problem with the PR system itself, use the bugmeister mailing address. Upon examination, in this case the mail was quarantined because you sent it base64-encoded. This rule is intentional. GNATS only works well when people use plain ASCII text for the message bodies. (To address a similar problem, there is _no_ circumstance where GNATS should have a stylesheet included: these have been showing up recently.) Please resubmit your reply; from where I am in an Internet cafe it is not feasible for me to try to fix this up. mcl