From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 19:07:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62351065674; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:07:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA82D8FC08; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:07:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04708B9B3; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:07:16 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:33:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p13; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201204210539.q3L5daIP049513@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201204210539.q3L5daIP049513@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204231433.25030.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:07:16 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, linimon@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/167128: ps(1): 'ps -e' or 'pw -wwe' doesn't display the environment of 32-bit processes (amd64-specific) X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:07:17 -0000 On Saturday, April 21, 2012 1:39:36 am linimon@freebsd.org wrote: > Old Synopsis: 'ps -e' or 'pw -wwe' doesn't display the environment of 32-bit processes > New Synopsis: ps(1): 'ps -e' or 'pw -wwe' doesn't display the environment of 32-bit processes (amd64-specific) > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-bugs > Responsible-Changed-By: linimon > Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Apr 21 05:38:25 UTC 2012 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > I'm not really sure how to classify this, but it isn't hardware-related, > so move it over to bin/. Well, the 32-on-64 bit is somewhat amd64-specific (though we have that same issue on powerpc now). However, can the submitter test this on 9-stable? There were some changes MFC'd after 9.0 that might fix this. -- John Baldwin