Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 20:31:41 -0800 (PST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> To: dillon@apollo.backplane.com Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, jhb@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: revised II buildworld comparison stable vs current w/ malloc.conf fixes Message-ID: <20020217.203141.90997753.imp@village.org> In-Reply-To: <200202180139.g1I1deU09585@apollo.backplane.com> References: <200202170818.g1H8ID067573@apollo.backplane.com> <200202171824.g1HIOnw71118@apollo.backplane.com> <200202180139.g1I1deU09585@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <200202180139.g1I1deU09585@apollo.backplane.com>
Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> writes:
: This is with Aj for /etc/malloc.conf on the current box, making it
: compatible with the stable box. Summary:
:
: stable/invariants: 1800 seconds
: current/invariants: 2097 seconds
:
: At least in regards to buildworld tests, current is very close to
: stable.
This is 16.5% Without invariants before, another percent or two was
gained by turning invariants off. I think that this means that we
have a good chance to hit the 10% worse mark on worldstone...
Of course, my -current box has other strange interrupt interactions
that is making psm spit out messages because interrupt latency is too
high. But I suspect that will also improve as we move towards
release...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020217.203141.90997753.imp>