From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 22 22:56:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C6C37B401 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 22:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from home.sdodson.com (66-133-141-187.dr1.tbr.ga.frontiernet.net [66.133.141.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7575943FA3 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 22:56:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sdodson@eagle4.cc.gasou.edu) Received: from home.sdodson.com (moo@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by home.sdodson.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4N1CRXC043073 for ; Fri, 23 May 2003 01:12:28 GMT (envelope-from sdodson@eagle4.cc.gasou.edu) Received: (from sdodson@localhost) by home.sdodson.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4N1CPpu043072 for gnome@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 01:12:25 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: home.sdodson.com: sdodson set sender to sdodson@email.gasou.edu using -f From: Scott Dodson To: gnome@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030523005542.GA19745@vectors.cx> References: <20030523005542.GA19745@vectors.cx> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1053652345.14171.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.3.3 (Preview Release) Date: 23 May 2003 01:12:25 +0000 Subject: Re: rebuild X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 05:56:29 -0000 On Fri, 2003-05-23 at 00:55, Adam Weinberger wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > >> (05.22.2003 @ 1749 PST): Randy Bush said, in 0.3K: << > > new install acting pretty sick, no panel, verrrrrrry slow, ... > > > > what do i portupgrade to force rebuild of the whole puppy? > > > > thanks. > > > > randy > >> end of "rebuild" from Randy Bush << > > portupgrade -r xft This brings up an interesting question. marcusmerge tells us to do portugrade -r pkgconfig. I'm wondering if any of these are particularly different? Wouldn't portupgrade -R gnome2 work as well? I've never had problems with any of the different methods. I'm just wondering if one is particularly useful in a certain situation over another, etc. -- Scott