From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 19:29:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC5D16A415; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:29:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DA843CA7; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:29:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from yavin.vindaloo.com (yavin.vindaloo.com [172.24.144.34]) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB08C5C6B; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:29:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.24.145.69] (endor.vindaloo.com [172.24.145.69]) by yavin.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8818824C4D; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:29:22 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45844912.7070103@vindaloo.com> Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 14:29:22 -0500 From: Christopher Hilton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: OpenBSD's spamd. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:29:43 -0000 Has anyone gotten a newer version of OpenBSD's spamd than the one in ports going? I'm cvsupping my ports tree now but since I didn't see an update on the cvs server I'm assuming 3.7 is the latest version. Between OpenBSD 3.7 and 3.8 spamd gained the ability to tarpit or stutter at all connections for a configurable period of time. I understand that stuttering for the first few seconds of the SMTP dialog causes many spammers to go away before even generating a greylisting tuple. It's something I'd like to try and see for myself and it will be fairly easy since my primary MX is behind an OpenBSD firewall. However, my secondary MX is a FreeBSD box with no such protection and I fear that the spammers will just take advantage of the fact that my secondary MX has weaker protections than my primary. -- Chris